Democrats keep claiming they do not support abortions up to birth, but every time they are asked if they support any limits on abortions they refuse to answer.
Why?
Because they support abortions up to birth.
And that was the case yesterday when Kamala supported killing babies in abortions up to birth and refused to answer whether she would support any limits on abortions. Harris refused to answer whether there should be any limits on late-term abortions that kill viable babies and got stuck in repeat mode where she began saying the same thing over and over.
Abortion came up Sunday on “Face the Nation” with moderator Margaret Brennan asking Harris about abortion and Roe v. Wade ahead of the 2024 election.
“You have been very active on the issue of abortion and rallying behind the idea of this federal law to restore what was upheld in Roe v. Wade,” Brennan said in setting up the segment. “But, to do that, Democrats need 60 votes in the Senate, they need a majority in the House they don’t have, they need the presidency. The math doesn’t add up. So don’t you need to level with the American people and say this is not a realistic promise to make for 2024?”
“Congress has the ability to put back in place the rights that the Supreme Court took from the women of America,” Harris replied.
When Brennan pointed out that Democrats don’t have the votes in Congress to do that, Harris suggested the election could change that and claimed, “The vast majority of Americans agree that the government should not be making this decision for the women of America.”
Click here to sign up for pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com
“What is it that you believe? I mean, what week of pregnancy should abortion access be cut off?” Brennan asked.
Harris clearly ignored the question and said, “We need to restore the protections of Roe v. Wade. We’re not trying to do something new.”
Brennan talked about the viability of unborn babies — which is now 21 weeks. And Harris interrupted to repeat herself again.
“No, no, no, no, no. let me be very clear,” the vice president interrupted. “Let me be very clear. From day one, the president has been clear. I have been clear. We need to put back the protections that are in Roe v. Wade into law. Since the Supreme Court took it, Congress has the power and ability to pass legislation to put those protections back in law, and Joe Biden will sign that bill. So, that is what we want.”
Brenann pressed further for an answer other than saying she supports putting Roe, which allowed unlimited abortions, back in place.
“But does it need to be specific in terms of defining where that guarantee goes up to and where it does not, at which week of pregnancy?
Harris repeat herself another time.
“We need to put back in place the protections of Roe v. Wade,” Harris droned on. “We’re not trying to do anything that did not exist before June of last year.”
Brennan asked her again about any limits on abortion and Harris continued her robotic responses.
“I am being precise. We need to put into law the protections of Roe v. Wade. And that is about going back to where we were before the Dobbs decision,” she said.
Brennan started getting frustrated at this point and had enough with Harris being evasive.
“Why do you think it shouldn’t be specific? You know, out in — out in New Mexico, for example, the governor there says it shouldn’t be nailed down to a week, because it should be a private matter between a woman and her doctor,” Brennan said. “There shouldn’t be a precise number put on that. Is that what you believe as well?”
“I believe that we should put the protections of Roe v. Wade into law, and the way that will happen is if we have a United States Congress who, regardless of their personal view for themselves or their family, would agree that the women of America should be trusted to make decisions about their life and their body, based on what they know to be in their best interest,” Harris concluded.
